The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Fatal Fury 2. Marasmusine (talk) 13:39, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Axel Hawk (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

Fictional character with no references. In particular, there are no secondary sources to establish notability as required by Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Notability (fiction). Article consists of in-universe history, which does not conform to Wikipedia:Manual of Style (writing about fiction) and WP:PLOT, and trivia, which does not conform to Wikipedia:Trivia sections. Pagrashtak 16:05, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• • Shut the hell up you damn hippie. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.32.116.89 (talk) 01:38, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game deletions. Pagrashtak 16:07, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete. No harm, but not notable enough. Arny (talk) 20:27, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak Keep Seems to be a well written and the cite source tag hasn't been up there long enough for a deletion now so my advice is give it a bit more time to grow.--AresAndEnyo (talk) 16:19, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  That's because I added it with the AFD; however, this doesn't address my contention that the subject is not notable. If there are secondary sources, they can be added. If there are not, this article cannot grow into anything encyclopedic, no matter how much time it is given. Pagrashtak 16:54, 11 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and Redirect to Fatal Fury 2. JuJube (talk) 13:56, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect but keep page history to the Fatal Fury characters list. User:Krator (t c) 14:39, 12 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect as per Krator unless there are sources added showing notability in his own right. Capitalistroadster (talk) 01:52, 18 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.