The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. LFaraone 00:21, 23 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Avinash Chiranjeev (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This subject fails WP:GNG/WP:BASIC and lacks citations, achievements, or positions that would indicate notability as a WP:PROFESSOR. JFHJr (㊟) 01:18, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:09, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:09, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:09, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Over promotional article. Not a notable person. I did not find any secondary reference on any reliabiable weblink. the article should be deleted speedly. Jussychoulex (talk) 16:13, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. 4 cites on GS for his work. Not enough. No sign of passing any of WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:57, 15 May 2013 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.