The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedily deleted as re-creation of a page that's apparently been deleted 4 times before: also spam, also minimal context (some of the previously deleted versions were in fact better), and, what the hell, no showing of importance either. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 19:45, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Auslogics Disk Defrag (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Article is a second attempt at advertising in vio of WP:SOAP after previous iteration of same article deleted in accord with AfD. Same issues remain: no apparent notability. No refs (and no suitable candidate refs, as it seems). This (or any other) software application could take on notability by dint of involvement with a significant event of some kind, but the odds are against it. —Scheinwerfermann ^T·_C02:49, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- StarM 03:50, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete- Wikipedia is not a directory of obscure software products. There are lots of computer applications out there; some are excellent and useful, but most are not notable. This one has little or no substantial coverage in reliable, independent sources so there's no reason it should be included in an encyclopedia. Reyk _YO! 04:36, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, possible speedy delete, both as obvious spam and as a very brief article without context. The text only announces the existence of a defragmenter program, and "helpfully" supplies a link to the page where it can be downloaded. - Smerdis of Tlön (talk) 15:19, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete G4. -Atmoz (talk) 17:47, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete (G4/A7/G11) — take your pick, either recreation of deleted material, no context, or spam. Text your response now!!! MuZemike (talk) 18:04, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete G4. JBsupreme (talk) 18:10, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.