The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. All species are notable. Basing a species article's right to exist on Google hits, once it has been proven to exist, is ridiculous. Awyong Jeffrey Mordecai Salleh 01:44, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This artical is very small and not very informing, if someone wants to learn about the Atlantic Jacknife Clam they will not be informed.—The preceding unsigned comment was added by M6gt2k6 (talk • contribs) . (Completed unfinished AfD nomination -- Scientizzle 00:15, 28 August 2006 (UTC))[reply]

• Strong Keep Atlantic jackknife clam is, in my opinion, a short, but useful stub. This was an attempted bad-faith nom in response to my nomination of M6gt2k6's Dragonball UD for deletion. Nominator failed to finish this AfD and instead moved on to blanking several articles (many that I indicate on my user page as having created or contributed to)[1] [2] [3] [4]. -- Scientizzle 00:15, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. I agree the article isn't the most informative around, but there seems to be a precedent for keeping species pages, however stubby, for future expansion. Espresso Addict 00:40, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep Whilst i agree that stubs are not the best of things, this article has references, and enough information to allow it to be expanded out to a full article. With references and notability (all distinct species can be considered this), it's hard to argue for deletion. LinaMishima 01:13, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep edit history of nom makes it clear this is a bad faith nom. Danny Lilithborne 01:14, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy Keep although article is not the greatest, no legitimate claim can be made that is should not exist.-- danntm ^T _C 01:27, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Knife Edge Neutral — Looks good enough to become a stub, but on the borderline of non notable with only 80 hits from google] Deon555^talk_Review 01:29, 28 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.