The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. >Radiant< 12:01, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Asia Link (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

orphaned for many months, I don't see this as a notable organization based on what is presented in the article. If it was more notable, even as is, other articles would link to it. Combine the orphan status and lack of notability shown in the article, I don't see why this is a wiki worthy article. Postcard Cathy 20:40, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, KrakatoaKatie 23:40, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete The content of the article utterly fails to distinguish this organization from any other - WP:HOLE. YechielMan 08:03, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.