The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:18, 5 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Asia Food Recipe

[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This was previously deleted through AfD and subsequently recreated. As far as I can tell, the new sections are a piece on viral videos, which is sourced entirely to press releases by the business, and a mention of a controversy which is again sourced to a press release they made. Other than the press releases, the only thing I can find are brief mentions of the business in regard to a survey they commissioned, where the focus is the survey with no substantial mention of the business itself. Otherwise, I can't find anything that would indicate notability, so it seems to fail Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies) and the GNG. Bilby (talk) 22:27, 21 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Most of the "references" are either press releases or fluff articles with data from a press release. This is pretty obvious advertising. Even the links on the viral advertising (such as a youtube video) are mainly on the video, not on the company involved with the ad. There's no notability that meets Wikipedia guidelines linked to in the article. --Mr. Vernon (talk) 03:17, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:49, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:49, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 03:32, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Significant coverage not demonstrated; hits for "Asia Food Recipe" on Google Books, News, and News archives are all either false positives, unreliable, or passing mentions. CtP (t • c) 00:50, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.