The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 01:39, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Arran Sheppard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

PROD removed by author without explanation. After searching for independent third party sources, I believe it fails GNG and BIO overall over primary sources. KGirlTrucker81 ^{huh? what I've been doing} 08:11, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. KGirlTrucker81 ^{huh? what I've been doing} 08:11, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. KGirlTrucker81 ^{huh? what I've been doing} 08:12, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Not enough independent and reliable sources.Politekid (talk) 21:51, 21 February 2017 (UTC) Politekid has been blocked as a sockpuppet.[reply]
• Delete a low level non-notable radio presenter.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:50, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.