The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 18:00, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Armorial of Chancellors of the Exchequer of Great Britain

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:N and some other guidelines and policies, like being a trivial intersection of characteristics, and a gallery. People have a personal (or family) coat of arms, and are chancellor: neither has a bearing on the other, the combination doesn't provide any additional information or insight. Fram (talk) 16:13, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Fram (talk) 16:13, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:INDISCRIMINATE. No indication that there is anything encyclopedic about the heraldry of Chancellors of the Exchequer, considered as a group. AleatoryPonderings (???) (!!!) 16:59, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Completely random. I don't know why anyone would want this on here. Bearian (talk) 19:03, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 10:59, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.