The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
A sideline reporter is not notable merely by being such. There is nothing to show that he has risen to any level of notability above and beyond that. DarkAudit (talk) 16:41, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Of course these are all subject to finding a consensus which is the point of this discussion, but most people who browse these discussions tend to keep these in mind (I assume...) WP:BIO. Aar☢n BruceTalk/Contribs16:54, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Most college broadcasters use local talent for out-of-booth reporting. Nothing here that makes him stand out even amongst other Big XII broadcast teams. "Nationwide" in this case is parsing at best. Nearly every major college broadcaster has a "nationwide" presence these days, thanks to the internet and satellite radio. Nothing here either that sets him apart. DarkAudit (talk) 16:56, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep In terms of Kappa Kappa Psi history, Texas Tech Goin Band history, as well as Texas Tech athletics history he is worthy of note, not just because he works in radio. Having been the first person representing the band and kappa kappa psi to have won homecoming king in the school's history, in addition to founding the fro bros. User:Jmcstrav
Comment this article would be fine for TexasTechepida, but not Wikipedia.--Rtphokie (talk) 13:28, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Young broadcast journalist with no obvious claim to notability. May deserve plaques in various campus locations, but falls well short of WP:BIO. --Dhartung | Talk20:46, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete of local interest only to Texas Tech sports fans. the major announcer/spokesman, on the other hand, would have some general recognition among football fans. Does anyone really think he's at the top level of his profession? DGG (talk) 16:46, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.