The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. No editors except the nominator provided substantial support for deleting, while the two editors supporting keeping did not respond to the nom's doubt about the sources provided. With one delete comment from a very new editor and one neutral vote, the most accurate description of the result of this discussion is NC. (non-admin closure)Timothytyy (talk) 13:18, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Does not meet WP:ORGCRITE. Independent coverage of the organization is extremely fleeting, with virtually no coverage outside of unbylined pieces that serve as vehicles for the organization's founders and supporters to talk about themselves (e.g. [1], [2]). Searching online lead me to more of the same kind of uncritical, fleeting coverage. Searching on Scholar, I found brief critical coverage in a source of dubious reliability ([3]) and articles by individuals affiliated with the organization, but nothing that simultaneously meets the criteria of independence and significance. signed, Rosguilltalk18:44, 8 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Rainn Wilson changes his name... - includes no information about the subject other than On behalf of environmental advocacy group Arctic Basecamp, "The Office" star posted a video discussing the worldwide impacts of weather shifts in the Arctic.
We cozy up like little sardines... - borderline in terms of whether it has enough independent analysis to contribute towards notability, non-attributed text about the subject is limited to Six global youth climate delegates have chosen to stay at Arctic Basecamp in Davos this year, with two more youth volunteers set to help the crew with logistics. Basecamp is a unique science-solution outreach platform pushing for urgent action on climate change from political and business leaders.
Agree for deletion. Coverage is not significant and it is difficult to understand tangible activities of this organization apart from self-promotion. Eagle.Jeff (talk) 06:52, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: One last try. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Clyde[trout needed]22:47, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I'm still on the fence at the moment. Vice is probably one of the better ones so far, so thanks to SailingInABathTub for providing it, but Bloomberg is substantially composed of quotes. Whiteman can likely qualify under PROF though. Alpha3031 (t • c) 09:12, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.