The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker^talk 01:20, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Archimedes paradox (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Hoax article confusing Hydrostatic paradox and Archimedes principle

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 23:12, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Parts of the article are legitimate, but they are already covered in the Hydrostatic paradox and Archimedes principle articles. The term "Archimedes paradox" seems to occur only in clones of this article, so the article subject seems to be nonexistent. -- 120.23.122.146 (talk) 11:12, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete As previously mentioned, this appears to be a combination of two other articles. This exact term doesn't appear to have any significant coverage.131.118.229.17 (talk) 20:34, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.