The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. SynergeticMaggot (talk) 23:26, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Arawak Jah[edit]

Non-notable group. Albums all self-released on their own Rasta Rumba label. Google News archive turns up 3 trivial mentions. Fails WP:MUSIC (and WP:V). —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 19:25, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. —Hello, Control ^{Hello, Tony} 19:27, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have expanded the article and added references to eight newspaper articles, all non-trivial mentions. It's enough to pass WP:MUSIC criterion #1. Keep. --Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 01:35, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti^{talk to me} 16:42, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, article establishes notability as per WP:MUSIC#C1. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 11:38, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.