The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. j⚛e decker ^talk 23:17, 20 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Anukriti Gusain

[edit]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: ((subst:spa|username)); suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)); accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)).

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Administrative listing per Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2014 May 5 -- RoySmith (talk) 18:12, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. ///EuroCarGT 19:25, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. ///EuroCarGT 19:26, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. ///EuroCarGT 19:26, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep person is notable and there are many RS, establish significance of Article. Let people add the information. 14.98.160.92 (talk) 00:47, 12 May 2014 (UTC) — 14.98.160.92 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 04:07, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes I agree. GKCH (talk) 04:11, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I agree with first AfD because of consensus. But this time its with keep as per discussion logs due to many indications e.g. Her participation in Miss Asia Pacific World, RS and now she is well known beauty personality. With all aspect I think its now well justifiable to keep this article. GKCH (talk) 04:18, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The sources in the article seem to meet WP:N even though many of them read like press releases. Hobit (talk) 18:17, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, I strongly think this is an encyclopedia detail about a person who is in Beauty pageant.Agsliil (talk) 04:50, 13 May 2014 (UTC) — Agsliil (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 04:07, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I always find Indian media hard to evaluate. None of them seem to resemble traditional Western quality news sources; they don't use the dry, cautious language to which I'm accustomed and I agree with Hobit that those sources read like press releases. I wonder to what extent they've been checked. However, I'm confident that if Anukriti Gusain was British or American or Australian and had similar accomplishments, then she'd have an article on Wikipedia. It seems unjust to deny her one because of the tone of the sources, so on balance I'm a weak keep.—S Marshall T/C 10:42, 13 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, she is notable. Reliable Sources are the references for information that may be use for significance of Article. 125.63.75.30 (talk) 12:32, 13 May 2014 (UTC) — 125.63.75.30 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 04:07, 17 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, definitely she is notable as per Wikipedia guideline. 14.98.183.205 (talk) 15:56, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
A word of caution Out of deference to AGF I don't want to make any specific accusations, but I will remind any editors contributing to this discussion that sock puppetry is a very serious no-no on Wikipedia and a quick way to get blocked or banned. You may comment as often as you like, but please !vote only once in this (or any other) AfD discussion. -Ad Orientem (talk) 20:50, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep , the Times of India references alone are more than enough to meet WP:GNG. Nfitz (talk) 19:07, 19 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.