The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn due to sourcing improvements. Bearcat (talk) 13:56, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anthony Hyde (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

WP:BLP of a writer, which makes no real claim to passing WP:AUTHOR, and which is sourced exclusively to a single commercial sales profile for one of his books on an online bookstore. A writer does not get an automatic inclusion freebie on Wikipedia just because he exists, nor does an online bookstore count as reliable source referencing — but a Google News search didn't turn up any serious indication of improved sourceability, resulting in just a small handful of glancing namechecks of his existence in articles about other things. Delete unless somebody knows where to find much better sourcing than I've been able to. Bearcat (talk) 18:23, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:43, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:43, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —JAaron95 Talk 18:28, 5 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.