The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted (A9) by Chrislk02. Non-admin closure. Deor (talk) 04:43, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Another Cult Classic

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable album by non-notable musician. Suburban Noize Records is hardly a major label, and the artist himself is far from notable, in my opinion. Drmies (talk) 05:22, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 14:32, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:21, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I should have tied this to the artist's AfD--please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pakelika (V.A.). Now that the article is deleted, the album is eligible under A9, but I'll let this ride. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 04:50, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per CSD A9; there is no indication that this album is independently notable. VQuakr (talk) 09:06, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.