The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 11:30, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Annu Navani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NACADEMIC or WP:GNG. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 10:05, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Academics and educators, Women, India, and United States of America. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 10:05, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: West Bengal, California, and Wisconsin. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 10:47, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Agree that an h-index of 11 and a total of 952 citations is insufficient for WP:NPROF in medical sciences. -- asilvering (talk) 17:52, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Agree with delete, per above Go4thProsper (talk) 16:26, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No significant peer reviews and all the references on her page are from short descriptions on the websites and other primary sources. I went through her publications and can confirm that they are not sufficient to consider the doctor notable per the above and my own search:
• https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Annu-Navani-250.46.167.81 (talk) 00:32, 4 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.