The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 17:53, 23 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Maria Fox (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Another one of several pages concerning the now-deleted Fox family of Falmouth, Wikipedia is not a genealogy site, and most of the sources are Fox genealogy references or Fox family journals. Fails WP:GNG. Penale52 (talk) 12:22, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:34, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:34, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:34, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

None of the references are genealogical sources. The two Journals of Caroline and Barclay Fox give an entertaining and informative picture of these influential people. Caroline has an ODNB article, as does her father. The initials AM in Barclay's journal usually mean an interesting tale of his elder sister.Vernon White . . . Talk

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.