The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 18:42, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anna-Lisa Christiane

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be autobiographical and doesn't appear to be notable. Beauty pageant contestents are not generally well-known in New Zealand. Haminoon (talk) 21:59, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:41, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:42, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Actually Speedy Delete would be better. Clearly self-promotional. No reliable sources whatsoever. Fails GNG, SIGCOV, COI. DerbyCountyinNZ ^{(Talk Contribs)} 01:52, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Not a national titleholder, basically seems to be self-promotional. Mabalu (talk) 01:56, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails GNG, reads like a COI case.LM2000 (talk) 02:21, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Very little sources to be notable. Self-promotional. CookieMonster755 (talk) 02:32, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:39, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.