The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A7 or snow, either is good. Tone 18:45, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anjli Jain Chopra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable enough to have a separate article on an encyclopedia. Notability has not been proved in reliable secondary source. Written like resume. Fails on basic criteria of notability. Just being Executive director does not give encyclopedic value. Hitro talk 21:09, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. The Facebook elements don't add to notability. Favonian (talk) 21:11, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete There is no indication of Notability. KevinOKeeffe (talk) 21:19, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as Wikipedia shouldn't be confused with Facebook, this could be a borderline A7 although that 260 colleges around the world thingy might stop it. -SpacemanSpiff^{Calvin‡Hobbes} 21:45, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedily Delete- I wonder how this page missed the eyes of our faithful patrollers.keystoneridin! (talk) 21:56, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: I can't find significant coverage per WP:BIO. Joe Chill (talk) 22:21, 11 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.