The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete (WP:SNOW) and salt. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:38, 20 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anjali yadav dancer (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Recreated after speedy deletion; retagged and speedy re-removed and a claim of significance subsequently provided. I've not been able to find sources to qualify the subject on GNG/SNG... I propose a deletion. What do other editors think? Thanks Lourdes 07:51, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:07, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Zero coverage to be found. Mr. Magoo (talk) 13:54, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: I'm not able to find any sources. Even the one cited in the article doesn't mention subject. As of now, fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. Anup [Talk] 13:57, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Anup [Talk] 13:58, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. The awards claim is provably false - here is a source for the winners of the Indian Television awards 2014, and she is not on it. Even if any of the other claims should be correct, she still does not meet any of the applicable notability criteria. --bonadea contributions talk 08:23, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like it has been deleted as a blatant hoax before, per the deletion logs for Anjali Yadav, Anjali yadav, Draft:Anjali Yadav and Draft:Anjali yadav. I don't know if the articles are identical but it does seem likely that it is the same hoax. --bonadea contributions talk 08:35, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Several other claims were also easy to prove wrong. I'm very certain that the whole article is a hoax. --bonadea contributions talk 07:53, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and salt as seems a hoax, could be speedied Atlantic306 (talk) 22:28, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Suggestion for the closing admin I would suggest not just deletion and salting this particular title, but including "Anjali Yadav" and combinations thereof in the title blacklist for at least a couple of months. Lourdes 01:58, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong delete and salt-A hoax at all probable extents.Aru@baska^{❯❯❯ Vanguard} 09:23, 17 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.