The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 02:33, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Angelo Antonio Toriello[edit]

Angelo Antonio Toriello (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Probably notable but the only hope for this article is WP:TNT. ProgrammingGeek ^talktome 18:14, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:18, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:18, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:18, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Strong delete The style is horrible, and the sourcing does not demonstrate notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:36, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Promotional garbage. The subject fails WP:GNG. Many of the references are mere mentions or are not independent. Because an article about this subject was deleted before, I'm wondering if this isn't eligible under WP:G4. Chris Troutman (talk) 00:58, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.