- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Tone 20:29, 27 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Aneesa Sharif (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails to meet basic GNG. Creator is a paid editor. Saqib (talk) 15:44, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 15:48, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 15:48, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 15:48, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Looking at what at first glance appears to be the strongest source, Deccan Herald – uh oh, at the end of the article this is printed: "DC doesn't endorse the above content". It's an advertorial. ☆ Bri (talk) 21:16, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Smells strongly of WP:PAID, no solid third-party sources to support notability. OhNoitsJamie Talk 00:12, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom --Devokewater @ 10:03, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.