The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Nja²⁴⁷ 08:57, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Andrea Tantaros (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Article was deleted back in December 2008. No reliable secondary sources are provided to suggest she is notable. Entire article is referenced by her website and her birthdate and full name is not even mentioned in her site. Fails WP:BLP1E Showtime2009 (talk) 02:56, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- the wub "?!" 09:02, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: Sorry I made an error. I thought it was an AfD before. It was a speedy delete candidate back in December 2008. Showtime2009 (talk) 10:14, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment The AfD template doesn't link properly to this discussion.
• Comment Is this the same Andrea Tantaros who was a spokesperson for Jeanine Pirro in 2005 and William Weld in 2006? When you combine the substantial coverage she received in those roles with her prominence as an analyst or pundit or whatever she is I think she clearly passes the notability guidelines. There are lots of sources. ChildofMidnight (talk) 19:31, 10 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it is. Regardless just about every source I could find is an article she wrote, transcript from tv appearance or some quotes she made as press secretary. I could not find anything that simply discusses her. Again I have no clue if that is even her real birthdate/full name. Showtime2009 (talk) 00:21, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I concede your point. But at some point I think when someone has enough high profile roles in campaigns, enough television interview appearances, and enough articles, they become notable. I think it's enough. But I'm willing to wait and see what others think. ChildofMidnight (talk) 02:05, 11 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete She may have had important roles, but I do not see a significant amount of coverage from third-party sources. John Asfukzenski (talk) 10:35, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, (X! · talk)  · @181  ·  03:20, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Non-notable The Red Peacock (talk) 09:20, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.