The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:21, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Amy Zidian[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Speedy delete for repost declined because article was different - yet there is nothing in the new article that speaks to the reasons the last AfD resulted in a delete vote. Peter Rehse (talk) 15:01, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 15:01, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wikipedia is not a tabloid, let alone a tabloid of the WWE. Nothing of substance here. The sources are weak, and the part that might gain some possibility of saving is based on the "low quality" Youtube videos, which is not only not using a reliable source but the "low quality" is original research, since it is sourced to the videos themselves and thus an editors own view that they are low quality.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:48, 7 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:02, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, basically states "she was an unsuccessful contestant, someone created a fake profile, it was not her". Fails WP:GAN big time. MPJ -US 13:32, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - fails WP:GNG. Nikki♥311 09:49, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.