The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 23:54, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Amundi Pioneer

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG. Largely sourced to press releases, with the puffery not filtered out. Coretheapple (talk) 15:31, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coretheapple (talk) 15:31, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:07, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Agree with nom; the sources are press releases, casual mentions and primary sources, none of which can contribute towards notability. Ravenswing 21:33, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finance-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:19, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.