The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-03-08 13:15Z

Aminah Assilmi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

After two years this article still fails WP:BLP policies. There are no secondary sources confirming notability except www.islamfortoday.com. Google only has 827 hits to her name [1]. This article seems to exist for only one reason, and that is to make the list of muslim converts longer. Sefringle 02:29, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, unverified and uncited article that fails the WP:BIO criterias. The organization she leads doesn't seem to be notable either; after going through Google News, nothing I found could verify that the organization has been "subject of multiple and non-trivial published works".--TBCΦtalk? 02:47, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete It's possible her organization is notable. If it is, it should have an article and this should be merged and redirect. If not, my vote stands. I can't find any information on her that's not already in this article, and that's not enough to justify its existence.--Djrobgordon 02:50, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep The article should be improved not deleted Al-Bargit 13:30, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It had over two years to prove notability, and it still hasn't passed notability requirements.--Sefringle 05:59, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, unsourced and unreferenced. If sourced and referenced i.a.w. WP:BIO by end of this AfD change to Keep Alf^Photoman 15:17, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletions. ITAQALLAH 16:07, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - no well-sourced content.Proabivouac 22:41, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom - no reliable sources, just a propagandist website. NBeale 23:02, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

• keep I've seen that picture lots of times. She must be famous. What harm does keeping it do? The information must come in useful sometime. The eid stamp bit was interesting— Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.145.242.116 (talk • contribs)
• Comment WP:ILIKEIT--Sefringle 21:57, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Al-Bargit above. --Webkami 15:29, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.