The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Speedy Keep, bad faith nom. 00:01, 20 April 2009 (UTC)
Keep. I've already issued a final warning to the nominator, who despite repeated warnings is continuing apparently going through Special:Allpages tagging articles for deletion for spurious reasons. – iridescent19:51, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Nonsensical nomination. No explanation as to why the nom thinks the article fails the guidelines cited, but the article topic is the in-depth subject of independent reliable sources, easily passing WP:N, not to mention WP:V (which isn't a notability guideline). --Oakshade (talk) 20:09, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.