The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. I'm glad to be able to withdraw this nomination. AleatoryPonderings work convinced me. Since he has done the research I will leave it up to his discretion about the actual article name, but I think the alternative names should have redirects. Thanks AleatoryPonderings for the work on this.   // Timothy :: talk  19:20, 31 July 2020 (UTC) (non-admin closure)   // Timothy :: talk  19:20, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Almas (folklore) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article does not meet WP:GNG and does not present encyclopedic information WP:INDISCRIMINATE.   // Timothy :: talk  13:26, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per the extensive bibliography in this entry in an RS (I've also cited it in a bunch of the other AfDs in this batch). Meets WP:GNG per those sources. I will try to track down the sources listed there later. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 14:39, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Maybe also move to "Almasty"—seems to be a much more common term for this mythical creature. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 16:34, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mythology-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 16:58, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.