The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 17:53, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, this article as seen below has already been deleted once, but someone re-made it. Alison doesn't meet Wiki's standards, she's not notable. --CJ 05:49, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: fixing AfD nomination as AfDx, creating new page for it and copying the above from old page. No vote. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alison Angel for old discussion. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:21, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Doesn't appear to satisfy the criteria for erotic actresses set out in Wikipedia:Notability (erotic actors). No awards mentioned, films, etc.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  06:34, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, fails WP:PORN BIO. --Coredesat 07:15, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• I'd note that Wikipedia:Notability (erotic actors) is only a proposed guideline. - brenneman ^{L} 08:09, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment Well, ignoring that, then I would say she's even less notable. --Coredesat 08:34, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. --Arnzy ^{(whats up?)} 13:09, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete SPAM. That so-called "fan site" seems to be just another portal to members-only content. (And damn them for it.) ~ trialsanderrors 16:40, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, subject doesn't meet WP:BIO and doesn't seem overly notable in her field... oh and page protect against further recreation.--Isotope23 18:42, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete, widely seen (cough) with this pseudonym featured, but not particularly notable in her niche. The article has no citations of media coverage even by niche magazines like Adult Video News, let alone reliable sources. Regardless of what the notability proposal ends up with, erotic models (especially Web-only ones) need more than their own website and frequent links on the daily-free-teasers lists to make me consider them WP-worthy. Barno 22:47, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. -- Joe Beaudoin Jr. ^{Think out loud — WP:PORN BIO?} 03:03, 25 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.