The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Withdrawn by nominator. Galobtter (pingó mió) 17:27, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Algonquian Confederacy of the Quinnipiac Tribal Council[edit]

Algonquian Confederacy of the Quinnipiac Tribal Council (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. I can see simple mentions of it in books but no discussion. It is also mentioned here[1] which says " (There is an “Algonquian Confederacy of the Quinnipiac Tribal Council.” Its leader, Iron Thunderhorse, is currently in prison in Texas for rape, and projected to be released in 2051, at the age of 107. He is half-Italian, was born William Coppola, and according to a legal filing by the Texas prison authority, was not listed as Native American on at least one of his purported birth.'" Iron Thunderhorse's article was basically written by the same editor who wrote this one in 2007 IIRC. Thunderhorse is a wannabe New Ager with a lot of self-published stuff and articles in "Ancient American" which edited by Frank Collin and is the usual fraudulent archaeology stuff, everybody came to America with some right wing stuff thrown in. Doug Weller talk 08:21, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect to Iron Thunderhorse, the highly dubious but seemingly notable character who created this otherwise non-notable entity. Cullen328 (talk) 08:36, 1 April 2023 (UTC) Cullen328 (talk) 08:36, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Ethnic groups, Organizations, and Connecticut. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:38, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. This needs to be rewritten to reflect what the organization really is instead of what they claim, which I can commit to doing once I get some free time (next week), but the organization is the subject of numerous newspaper articles (even in recent years). This organization is still active. A fact-based article would provide ballast against all the wild claims online. Yuchitown (talk) 14:15, 1 April 2023 (UTC)Yuchitown[reply]

  Ok, I'm willing to withdraw this if User:Cullen328 is. I could only find mentions, you've done a better job! Doug Weller talk 14:24, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  I solemnly swear to revamp this article within two weeks. Not an April Fools statement—LOL. Yuchitown (talk) 14:47, 1 April 2023 (UTC)Yuchitown[reply]

  No objection to keeping, then. Cullen328 (talk) 16:59, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  @Cullen328@YuchitownOn my iPad, not sure how to do this without making a mess. Doug Weller talk 17:42, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.