The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 03:38, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Alejandro Gaviria (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

all sources are self, faculty cards, or lists of pubs, no secondary sourcing establishing notability aprock (talk) 05:10, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. — — alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 05:14, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Heavily cited for an academic working in the third world — Google scholar lists four papers with over 100 citations each and an overall h-index of, I think, 21 (it's a little hard to tell because in this case GS is being worse than usual at sorting the papers by citation count). I think it's enough for WP:PROF#C1. Being dean is not a WP:PROF criterion and I don't really know how to evaluate the medal, but those both indicate that the high citation count is not an outlier. —David Eppstein (talk) 05:46, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep with GS h-index somewhere around 20. Xxanthippe (talk) 08:33, 3 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]
• Keep Agree that he meets the requirements for an authority in his subject. DGG ( talk ) 03:34, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.