The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep - Philippe | Talk 03:20, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Alaa Abdulkareem Fartusi

[edit]

Subject of article, while unfortunately recently deceased, is a casualty of a bombing which already has its own article - 2008 Balad bombing. Article does not establish that the subject has any notability beyond being a victim of that incident. Wikipedia is also not a memorial. Ozgod (talk) 16:28, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --House of Scandal (talk) 19:52, 4 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Several journalists that died during conflict have articles. Died in a notable bombing. Chandlerjoeyross (talk) 01:43, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
In which case they should be listed within the article which covers the event that they died in. Much like the Virginia Tech massacre where most of the biographies of the victims are kept within the article - unless they were notable for something they did within the scope of that event that made them notable. --Ozgod (talk) 04:52, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep He was a notable cameraman for a Shiite TV station. We have articles on almost all cameramen at American TV stations. Plus, he was the first journalist killed this year in Iraq. Deleting this ould prove how much systemic bias Wikipedia has. Editor of the wiki 09:44, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep -Just try to expand on info about his life/career ♦Blofeld of SPECTRE♦ ^$1,000,000? 11:35, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.