The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 20:16, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Al-Zebabist Nation of Ooog

[edit]

AfDs for this article:

Articles for deletion/Al-Zebabist Nation of Ooog (2nd nomination)

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has been deleted before on notability grounds and has been notability tagged since March 2017. In common with many articles of this kind (see the successfully deleted Patriotic Socialist Party), this outfit was a one-off novelty act with little to no notable independent coverage, little to no electoral impact, little to no notable people associated with them, and little to no notable impact after their time in the spotlight. Notability is not attached to political parties merely by their existing, they must do something other than stand for election to be notable. By that measure alone Al-Zebabist Nation of Ooog fails WP:GNG. doktorb _words^deeds 17:37, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:22, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:23, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:23, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of frivolous political parties#United Kingdom (with or without a couple of extra words there), as a possible wikireader lookup. Coolabahapple (talk) 05:04, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG and any notability guidelines. This article is not any more notable then when it was deleted the first time, so the decision should be clear here. Newshunter12 (talk) 07:25, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.