The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mr.Z-man 23:45, 31 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Akira Lane (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non-notable pornographic model. See WP:PORNBIO. No sources. The article seems like all original research and may even just be promotional advertising for her site. Did a search for RS and couldn't find anything beyond a recitation of her name. Morbidthoughts (talk) 22:57, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Morbidthoughts (talk) 23:06, 26 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No Independent Reliable sources. Tosqueira (talk) 07:16, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete This is merely and advertisement dressed up like a (bad) WP article. No sources. No notability. WP:SNOW. David in DC (talk) 20:43, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.