The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 05:03, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Airdisaster.com[edit]

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Site was referenced a couple times in the context of a couple airline crashes, but doesn't seem to have had lasting notability on its own. Nothing better found in a WP:BEFORE. Previous AFD way back in 2005 closed as "no consensus". Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:28, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Aviation and Websites. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 21:28, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Airdisaster.com was little more than a blip among aviation safety sources in the early Web 2.0, and it wasn't even that authoritative. --Deeday-UK (talk) 21:29, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:43, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as non-notable. I see a bunch of citations to this site in Google Books, News etc., but next to no actual descriptions that could be used to write meaningful prose on it. Glades12 (talk) 17:04, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.