The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Xclamation point 01:54, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Air Cambodia[edit]

Air Cambodia (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Nominating this for the same reasons that it was nominated 12 months ago. A "company" which was "established" in 2004 could not have flown passengers in 1996. There was an airline called "Royal Air Cambodge" formed in 1955 and renamed in 1970 to "Air Cambodge", and which operated until 1975.[1] The "Royal Air Cambodge" name was resurrected in 1993 and operated until 2001. In 2002, Hainan Airlines was going to start an airline called "Air Cambodia", but this never got past planning stages. In 2004, Phuket Airlines announced a plan to start an airline called "Air Cambodia" (this article) [2], but it too never got past the inital planning stage. There is nothing available in the media that gives detailed information on this failed start-up, past that it was to have been a joint-venture project with the Cambodian government; it's a byline in Cambodian failed airline start-ups. It's absolutely not-notable, deserving perhaps of a mention in some type of list of failed airline start-ups, but not of an actual article. Russavia ^Dialogue 05:11, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cambodia-related deletion discussions. -- KuroiShiroi (talk) 05:28, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- KuroiShiroi (talk) 05:29, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Per review of article and Russavia's reliable expertise on this field. ChildofMidnight (talk) 05:51, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, regardless of the existence and notability of previous airlines, this one shows no proof of notability — companies, even airlines, can't be inherently notable. Nyttend (talk) 13:29, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as per Russavia's comment no evidence airline ever operated. MilborneOne (talk) 19:55, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.