The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 07:36, 18 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ahmet Orun

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Autobiography tagged as failing WP:PROF since 2013, and still no reliable independent sources have been added. Oxford Brookes is not a university with much of a research reputation. Guy (Help!) 10:45, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Musa Talk 11:51, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:08, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:08, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:58, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Per nom. Did a quick search didn't find much evidence of notability. Insert CleverPhrase Here 06:10, 11 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Google scholar citation record too slim for WP:PROF#C1 and no other indication of notability. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:34, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Agree, GS fail. Agricola44 (talk) 16:22, 17 March 2016 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.