The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 00:11, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Agraceful

[edit]
Agraceful (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable band. No reliable sources identified despite GS search.The only hope in the list of Google news archive hits was a review that turned out to be user-contributed, not editorial appears likely . All the other references were in club listings and the like. Bongomatic 05:16, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That is the review that is user-submitted—essentially a blog entry. It is not actually part of the newspaper. Bongomatic 05:30, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
How do you know it's use submitted and not by someone who legitimately works for the paper? (There were three user submitted reviews in one of their album articles, which I redirected.) Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many ottersOne batOne hammer) 05:33, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I don't. However, the Leader claims to be a blog. See its advertising page. This is not the historical newspaper. Bongomatic 05:45, 13 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.