The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 21:25, 28 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes. However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: ((subst:spa|username)); suspected canvassed users: ((subst:canvassed|username)); accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: ((subst:csm|username)) or ((subst:csp|username)).

Vanity - non notable. -- Szvest 16:31, 23 April 2006 (UTC) ^{Wiki me up™}[reply]

• "He is rumoured to be worth over £750" heh... Delete it please... -- Grafikm_fr 16:54, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Although this was probably started as a vanity article, there is another user been editing it, so perhaps he's not entirely non notable. Ergo weak delete Paul Carpenter 19:24, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Agj is a good authour don't delete this —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Badgerbadgerbadger (talk • contribs) .
• The original page didnt have much info on agj but now im working on it too (i edited it) and i will help to make it better —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Blingoy (talk • contribs) .
• Comment Please note that Badgerbadgerbadger (talk · contribs · count), Blingoy (talk · contribs · count) who is changing/deleting votes on this AfD, and Chavmaster (talk · contribs · count) who created the article would all appear to be the same person/meatpuppets. See also 86.137.255.123 (talk · contribs · count). ➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 20:07, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete NN as per nom. ≈ jossi ≈ t • @ 20:10, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy delete as hoax, vanity, nonsense and Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day - the forums linked from the article reveal "Agj" to be a bored schoolboy. ➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 20:20, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• I would like to say that i am neither 'chavmaster' or 'Badgerbadgerbadger' and this is my account. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Blingoy (talk • contribs) .
• Comment for closing admin Please add Matt Harris series to this AfD - related nonsense created by User:Blingoy. ➨ ❝REDVERS❞ 20:23, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Delete A vanity page through and through. The "He is rumoured to be worth over £750." quote gave me a good laugh though, thanks.--Cini 20:50, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Strong Delete. I suspect that founders of significant publishing houses are worth a lot more than £750. Capitalistroadster 23:51, 23 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Non verifiable WP:V.--blue520 07:17, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, see WP:BALLS. Stifle (talk) 16:19, 26 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.