The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs^(talk) 01:23, 16 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Afton Live

[edit]

Borderline case where one reliable source appears to exist, but nonetheless asserted to fail WP:CORP. SchuminWeb (Talk) 08:33, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. After some searching, the Portland Mercury article cited is the only non-trivial, reliable source coverage of this corporation; there is some blog coverage, and some trivial mentions. As such, fails WP:CORP. Baileypalblue (talk) 22:54, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 02:26, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

Merge some of the content in here into a new article detailing pay-to-play scams. This is a big thing in the music industry and is worthy of an article, with Afton being a prominent offender. --Iron Chef (talk) 23:45, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton ^Tropical ^Cyclone 04:30, 11 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - tempest in a teapot. Merge the useful content, if you wish. Bearian (talk) 20:26, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.