The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete.—Quarl(talk) 2007-02-26 09:09Z
Lack of notability, references or updates Ozgod 03:08, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as per nom. See, I can say that, because I wasn't the nominator. ;) Feeeshboy 06:03, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Very limited Google hits. Has obviously published poetry but "New Decadence movement" is next to nil on Google. --PigmanTalk to me 19:54, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete lacks any sources to establish notability per WP:BIO.-- danntmTC 22:32, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.