The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:27, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Actus Digital

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is sourced mostly to press releases. There are some sources that could be scrounged, but since it is a subsidiary, it seems more appropriate for an article to be started on Taya Media Group, with this subsidiary mentioned briefly. CorporateM (Talk) 04:01, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:25, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 12:25, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:30, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete my searches were consistent w/ nominator's, virtually everything I found for this firm were non-independent, press-release style promotional coverage, as are the article's sources. Boogerpatrol (talk) 22:54, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.