The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete per discussion. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 12:25, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Activated phenolics

[edit]
Activated phenolics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

article is not supported by current science; appears to be WP:OR

Delete: It's WP:PROFRINGE , not valid science, google search comes up with nothing. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 16:06, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: There is no evidence in WP:SCIRS literature that ingested polyphenols ("phenolics") a) have definable roles in vivo or b) are "activated". On the contrary, polyphenols are extensively cleaved into smaller compounds whose fate is for rapid excretion. A similar article already exists, adequately explaining the state of science. There is no WP:MEDRS literature indicating any anti-disease benefit of a polyphenol-rich diet or benefit of polyphenols being "activated". The article as first written by Revitalizer appears to be an opinion essay not supported by reliable sources or clear definition. The article should be deleted. --Zefr (talk) 16:30, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete In addition to the objections already raised, "phenolics" is normally used to refer to phenolic resins, a type of polymer, and it is not at all clear why "phenolics" is being used instead of "polyphenols" here. Roches (talk) 20:19, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A content fork of Phenols. MarkBernstein (talk) 20:22, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Phenols. The article has been reduced to a stub after removing WP:PROFRINGE material and pretty much has no real claim to stand alone notability. Any reliably sourced material can be added to the already established article. -Ad Orientem (talk) 21:21, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

delete nothing here folks; a made-up thing. Jytdog (talk) 21:26, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Health and fitness-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:33, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organisms-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:33, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per MarkBernstein. Geogene (talk) 20:25, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:29, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:29, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Zefr. shoy (reactions) 14:01, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
More