The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:23, 5 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Absolution (professional wrestling) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:GNG. No significant coverage in reliable independent sources. Only WP:ROUTINE match results. Has existed for one week, so also WP:TOOSOON. Nikki♥311 03:04, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Nikki♥311 03:05, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Object, The trio has been refered to as Absolution on WWE programming and WWE are not going to change their minds now that Rose and Deville have been called up. The team is here to stay, and so should their article.Crawnax (talk) 03:07, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:CRYSTAL. We can't predict what will happen in the future. We have to work with what we have available now, and the stable has not received coverage from reliable independent sources. Nikki♥311 03:34, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Good example of WP:TOOSOON. There really isn’t much info the article can include as of now anyways because the team only existed for a week. No accomplishments and zero matches as a team. I don't see any significance. Sekyaw (talk) 04:41, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete If they break up next week will they be remembered for anything? Fails WP:GNG, WP:TOOSOON.LM2000 (talk) 05:17, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete It's hard to object that the team will not make an impact; but clearly too soon. If one were to get released/injured tomorrow; the page would be dead. If it were a singles wrestler, it wouldn't be too bad; as appearing on WWE TV should be enough to get enough information; but this isn't enough to warrant a page as a team; this information can be used between the three's personal entries. Lee Vilenski(talk) 10:14, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Clearly not notable, and the only sources included are for the individual's finishing moves. - Galatz^Talk 14:31, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Way too soon. It's been a week. Kjscotte34 (talk) 17:56, 28 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete or better redirect to Paige (wrestler) as TOOSOON. Str1977 ^(talk) 15:19, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep As of right now, I feel like the trio is notable enough to keep the page. Zorbo678 (talk)

• Delete – Right now they are only known for interfering in various Womens Division matches, other than that they have no achievements in WWE. They haven't really made their mark in WWE and creating this page at this time is not a good idea. There is still the future to look at and if they make a big mark/statement in WWE then I am all for re creating this page, but as of now it should be deleted. SSGeorgie (talk) 03:28, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete WP:TOOSOON no questions asked. Nickag989^talk 18:54, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.