The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. postdlf (talk) 05:43, 5 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Abhigyan anurag

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Bishnu Saikia (talk) 14:24, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment No rationale for the nomination has been provided. However I can see a strong case for a deletion on the grounds that there is no evidence that the person is notable, either under WP:CREATIVE or under WP:PROF. The article history is strange - it started as an article about a book, in which form it went through WP:CSD and WP:PROD, but then morphed into an (auto)biography (which in itself looks very challnged to meet CSD A7)? AllyD (talk) 14:53, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:43, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Subject appears to fail all notability criteria. Ray^Talk 16:01, 31 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for reasons already stated. WP:BLPPROD would have been more direct, since this a new-ish BLP without any sources. Agricola44 (talk) 21:21, 3 January 2013 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.