The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. plicit 03:40, 31 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Abdullah Rava[edit]

Abdullah Rava (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

After suspecting sockpuppetry here and here on an AfD created by @User4edits, I tried to check why it doesn't exist on fawiki, apparently it was already deleted there several times because of no notability. Then stumbled upon this article via some relevant sock accounts. It looks like this was also deleted a lot of times on fawiki as non-notable and even salted indefinitely [1], so nominating it here as well. Tehonk (talk) 02:53, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unless reliable English translations of references, establishing notability, can be provided. While foreign language references are fine per WP:RSUEC, there's no mention of "Abdullah Rava" or "Abdullah Rawa" in any English language searches. If you haven't already, I'd file at SPI if you suspect sockpuppetry. Schrödinger's jellyfish  05:50, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.