The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Discussion is trending keep, with editors claiming to have found significant coverage in Arabic. However, no discussion of these sources occurred, and late keep !votes were not adequately grounded in policy, due to either brevity or to the misindentification of WP:FPL, which is not a current policy or guideline and does not have any weight at this time. signed, Rosguill talk 15:29, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Abdulaziz Al-Elewai (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of wp:notability under GNG or SNG. The only sources are dtatbase type entries on web sites, and the few sentences of text are just basic database type facts. North8000 (talk) 22:21, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewed during NPP.

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 (talk) 05:11, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 07:37, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep a few Arabic sources out there if you bother to look, nothing much Englis-hwise however. Thief-River-Faller (talk) 21:45, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.