The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. -- Ed (Edgar181) 14:37, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Abdirov Charjou

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Searches for any reliable sources for this person have yielded nothing. Delete as non-notable. 4meter4 (talk) 03:59, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:02, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 13:03, 24 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Fails WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 21:53, 24 October 2011 (UTC).[reply]
Weak delete Probably notable, but it's pretty difficult to find any sources. The best I could find was this translated announcement by the Uzbek Academy of Sciences, which also indicates he was elected member of the academy in 1989. However, besides the lack of sources, the article also needs to be moved and copy-edited. --Axolotl Nr.733 (talk) 12:13, 25 October 2011 (UTC) Article has been substiantially edited in the meantime. Sources still are an issue, but I don't see any immediate need for deletion. --Axolotl Nr.733 (talk) 16:00, 10 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Uzbekistan-related deletion discussions. —Axolotl Nr.733 (talk) 13:59, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: cited things - Elected membership of the Uzbek Academy of Sciences - Street named after him in Nukus and being a noted leprosy scholar. The Russian wikipedia article on which this article is based is sourced to "Vesti Karakalpakstan» № 54 (16188) July 5, 1997 - and their and our article indicates clear pass of notability - Minister of Health of the Republic of Karakalpakstan , Rectorship of a Uni. ,membership of the Supreme Council of the Republic of Karakalpakstan - deputy of the Oliy Majlis. Sourcing in English is difficult but our coverage of central asian things seems very poor and it would be a shame to loose this.(Msrasnw (talk) 00:28, 26 October 2011 (UTC))[reply]

It's difficult for me to tell whether these sources are of any quality. Bare urls hardly help support your arguement. Are these weblinks to reputable sources per wikipedia's policies at WP:Verifiability?4meter4 (talk) 00:41, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've tried to improve the refs and notified the article's creator User talk:Lepesbay about this proposal to delete the article he started. (Msrasnw (talk) 20:25, 26 October 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 07:33, 31 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I have mentioned this article and Afd at the Russian Wikipedia to ask for help with referencing but there is nothing yet. (Msrasnw (talk) 09:54, 1 November 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Keep Hardly someone will compose such information for any reason. If someone will be interested in person - let them get information. There was no Internet those days and after USSR reformation no printing also. (talk) 18:46, 5 November 2011 (UTC))[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 04:33, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, appears notable, meets WP:BIO. – Phoenix B 1of3 (talk) 18:36, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, Google books on the author Ch. A. Abdirov produces 2 books. Google Nukus "Ch. Abdirov" shows the street named after him. Google Scholar author:Abdirov Produces cited papers. Seems notable.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.