The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 14:12, 1 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A VerySpatial Podcast (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not pass WP:GNG. The Directions Magazine source is an WP:INTERVIEW. The ESRI award is not a major award as far as I can tell (it doesn't have it's own Wikipedia article) and the podcast's parent company won the award, not the podcast. TipsyElephant (talk) 12:20, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Popular culture, Geography, and Internet. Shellwood (talk) 13:28, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - While it has won an award from Esri, there's no article for the award, so that doesn't meet WP:WEBCRIT #2 as it doesn't otherwise appear to be a "well-known" award, and the article fails WP:GNG outright. One interview and one niche industry award do not create notability for the article's subject. Considering how long the podcast has been running, an impressive 16 years, you'd think there would be coverage in all that time, but there's nothing that can be found to support notability for the subject. - Aoidh (talk) 00:16, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Unfortunately, not enough notability present as of now. Handmeanotherbagofthemchips (talk) 15:46, 26 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.