The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Valoem ^talk ^contrib 21:52, 29 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

AIDS Museum

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are no secondary sources on the page at all, and a gooogle search reveals...the website, the wikipedia page and three unrelated projects. Fails WP:N. In addition, a notability template has been there since 2008. Swordman97 ^{talk to me}

Weak keep. There is also a "World AIDS Museum," which is connected to Magic Johnson and seems to have more reliable sourcing available. I found two weak sources for this article [1] and an Examiner article that seems to be blocked. I think this article could be expanded to cover the larger project; if it is, enough sourcing could likely be found. Perhaps it could be renamed "AIDS museums," or something like that? —Theodore! (talk) (contribs) 05:18, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Jersey-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep there are some issues with the article, namely that it's quite likely a copyvio, but there are enough sources about the museum to ensure that it meets WP:ORG. Sources not present and tags present speak to BEFORE, not notability StarM 01:53, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and Rename this isn't a second vote, I forget how to strike. I've cleaned up the G11 and G12 issues ad added sourcing. The article should be kept, however I think it should be renamed as AIDS Museums in America or similar as there's another in development and other countries have AIDS museums so this may need DABing. Should this not close as a flavor of keep, would the closing admin please userfy it for me? Thanks! StarM 00:59, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Keep, edit, develop Wikipedia. --do ncr am 02:41, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.